Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alpha:Binlor Ironshield"

From DDwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
* Well I figured the page should offer things beyond what's already in the [[Gods]] page. Plus the data on the Gods page is formatted in a way that would fit the table, and provide an at-a-glance evaluation of each god against each other god, which is exactly what it does. The individual pages should therefore be a little more in-depth, to give a reason for them to exist. It's not too cluttered though, is it?--[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 22:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 
* Well I figured the page should offer things beyond what's already in the [[Gods]] page. Plus the data on the Gods page is formatted in a way that would fit the table, and provide an at-a-glance evaluation of each god against each other god, which is exactly what it does. The individual pages should therefore be a little more in-depth, to give a reason for them to exist. It's not too cluttered though, is it?--[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 22:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 +
** Doesn't look hateful at all and does a good job expanding on the summary information. Have a little bit going on here or else I'd copy your format and try to make a few more god pages. Maybe tomorrow.--[[User:Gentlegiant03|Gentlegiant03]] 22:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:14, 23 November 2010

This format is MUCH better. Not even sure if I should continue creating the other pages? I think you have it.--Gentlegiant03 22:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

  • Well I figured the page should offer things beyond what's already in the Gods page. Plus the data on the Gods page is formatted in a way that would fit the table, and provide an at-a-glance evaluation of each god against each other god, which is exactly what it does. The individual pages should therefore be a little more in-depth, to give a reason for them to exist. It's not too cluttered though, is it?--Headrock 22:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
    • Doesn't look hateful at all and does a good job expanding on the summary information. Have a little bit going on here or else I'd copy your format and try to make a few more god pages. Maybe tomorrow.--Gentlegiant03 22:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)