Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alpha:APHEELSIK"

From DDwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'This is a suggested format for individual Glyph pages. Note that other Glyphs may require slightly different format due to their unique properties, but I think the basic idea sho…')
 
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
--[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 00:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Headrock|Headrock]] 00:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
*I think it looks pretty good. The issue with glyphs that this seems to address is that they're very situational based in use (requiring an explanation). Looks like a lot of work (much like the Gods pages) so kudos on the contribution... I'd help where I could but sometimes having to work around another person's framework and make corrections can be more time consuming than just doing it yourself. As far as the template, its kind of weak, may or may not need more details (like a section for "Gods perception" or something).--[[User:Gentlegiant03|Gentlegiant03]] 15:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:37, 6 December 2010

This is a suggested format for individual Glyph pages. Note that other Glyphs may require slightly different format due to their unique properties, but I think the basic idea should be sound - covering all of the most important angles of each Glyph.

In the meanwhile I haven't actually linked anything to this page yet - pending agreement on the format. Feel free to make edits and see if you can improve where necessary.

Also a nice template would be good right now. Gentlegiant? :)

--Headrock 00:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

  • I think it looks pretty good. The issue with glyphs that this seems to address is that they're very situational based in use (requiring an explanation). Looks like a lot of work (much like the Gods pages) so kudos on the contribution... I'd help where I could but sometimes having to work around another person's framework and make corrections can be more time consuming than just doing it yourself. As far as the template, its kind of weak, may or may not need more details (like a section for "Gods perception" or something).--Gentlegiant03 15:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)